Vancouver estate lawyers discuss how intestate works when a child is adopted out
Vancouver, BC -- (ReleaseWire) -- 05/01/2018 --In part one of this two-part blog series, the estate lawyers at Kushner Law looked at the case of the Atrill Estate, 2018 BCSC 350. The case centered around a will that named a predeceased wife as the main beneficiary. One son, Ian James, also deceased, had been omitted from the will. However, Mr. James had three children, including one who had been adopted out. The court then sought to establish what, if any, claim Mr. James' children had on the estate.
For more, go to: http://www.kushnerlaw.ca/estate-litigation-intentionally-excluded-and-adopted-out-intestate-entitlements-for-children-of-the-deceased-part-2/
It is common for Estate Litigation lawyers to remind their clients to keep updated and valid wills. When there is a gift to a person who pre-deceases the testator and the will does not have an adequate residuary clause, an intestacy or partial intestacy can occur.
In the Atrill case, the Court found that the actions of the testator did not trump the rights of intestate successors under the Wills Estates and Succession Act. The Court also had to make a decision with respect to the rights of the child who had been adopted out.
The Court made the following comments:
 Amanda Morden is the biological child of Ian James Atrill but was adopted out during his lifetime. The Adoption Act, R.S.B.C.1996, c. 5, s. 37 provides that on the making of an adoption order the pre-adoption parent ceases to have any parental rights or obligations to the child who is the subject of the order. Section 3 of WESA provides that a child who was adopted out is not entitled to the estate of the pre-adoption parent on an intestacy.
 In Boer v. Mikaloff, 2017 BCSC 21 (CanLII), Funt J. held that a child who has been adopted out has no claim on his or her pre-adoption family in the event of an intestacy. Paragraphs 21 through 26 read as follows:
 Subsection 37(1) of the Adoption Act provides that when an adoption order is made, "the child becomes the child of the adoptive parent" and "the adoptive parent becomes the parent of the child". Section 1 of the Adoption Act defines a "child" as "an unmarried person under 19 years of age".
 Our Court of Appeal in Clayton v. Markolefas, 2002 BCCA 435 (CanLII), addressed whether an adopted child was "issue" of her birth father enabling her to be entitled to a portion of her birth father's intestate estate. The Court considered in detail, s. 37 of the Adoption Act as it then read. For the purpose of the case at bar, the changes to s. 37 of the Adoption Act at the time of Clayton and now are not significant.
 Justice Donald and Justice Saunders concurred in the disposition of the appeal and agreed with Esson J.A.'s interpretation of the Adoption Act. Justice Donald shared Saunder J.A.'s reservation in her concurring reasons as to the concern Esson J.A. expressed regarding "the consequences that would flow from granting to adoption children a right of succession against their birth parents".
 In the case at bar, unless an exception applies, the effect of s. 37(5) of the Adoption Act is that the plaintiff, upon adoption, became the child of his adoptive parents and his adoptive parents became his parents. The plaintiff was no longer a child of his birth mother, the late Ms. Mikaloff. Such would be the "family relationships" as determined by s. 37 of the Adoption Act.
 Ms. Morden claims a share in the residue of the Atrill estate through her relationship to her biological parent not through her adopted family. She is, however, as the law of this province provides, a "descendant" of her adopted family and is not a descendant of Ian James nor a descendant of William Hugh Atrill. She therefore cannot share in the residue of the Atrill estate.
For questions about intestate succession, will variation or estate litigation in Vancouver BC, contact the Kushner Law Group at 604-629-0432 or online to schedule a consultation.
About Kushner Law Group
The Kushner Law Group was founded on the principle that a small law firm should be able to offer the same level of legal advice as a big firm at an affordable cost. A unique combination of legal experience and creativity allows the professionals at Kushner to come up with creative and practical solutions for a variety of legal problems.
For additional information, please visit http://kushnerlaw.ca/ or call 604-629-0432.
Kushner Law Group
Phone 604-629-0432 Fax 604-689-4451
Company website: http://www.kushnerlaw.ca/
1008 Beach Ave #105